Comments on: Jehovah’s Witnesses Least Likely to Accept Evolution

By: John Mieske

John Mieske — Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:09:50 +0000

And here Darwin started out as a Christian. Interesting he BECAME an Atheist over time. Kinda like us who WERE JWs and we LEFT that cult over time.

By the way, the book “Charles Darwin - And the origin of the species” is a neat book. Which later got refined by scientists over time.

A movie about Darwin and his life is entitled “Creation” ( 2009) starring Paul Bettany who played that part well.

By: JUNE

JUNE — Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:05:45 +0000

EVOLUTION HEY MARAMI NA AKO NATALO SA DEBATE SA EBOLUSYON DAHIL NAKAHULA NA IYAN SA ROMA 1: 21 NA HINDI KIKILALANIN ANG DIYOS WALA SILANG PATUNAY DAHIL YUNG UNGGOY TUMANDA NA LANG DI PA NAGING TAO KAHIT YUNG SITAW DI NAGING SANTOL

By: Jason

Jason — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 12:07:02 +0000

Awesome comment Claudia!!!

By: Claudia

Claudia — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:37:53 +0000

Also, evolution is a religion. It takes even more faith to believe in that story.

By: Claudia

Claudia — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:33:55 +0000

PS. Get past my typing skills. My thinking is just fine. I was made in Gods image. You should do some searching yourself. Or better yet, ask my creator. He talks to people he respects, and they almost always the people who respect him or are willing to listen.

By: Claudia

Claudia — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:22:14 +0000

you may be related to an ape and that is why you would blindly believe
the BS that one man, Darwin wrote with yet after 200 years no real
proof. The more and more science keeps proving that evolution is imposable. Even Darwin’s own comment about his ideas states and proves that he is wrong.There is no such thing as as a simple cell. He state that is need to be slow change in one one direction or he claim that he is wrong. Since that is not the case he is wrong. People like you keep trying to bend the rules to make it work and it doesn’t. I have yet to see proof of “spontaneous generation” or “punctuated evolution”. So which is it fast or slow? The reason that Christian may believe in evolution is because like me they were lied to in school and only after I look at the facts was mad as ______ that I had been tricked. By the way the teacher who was tried for teaching evolution in school lost and was fined. Also most of our founding fathers came to be free to be serve God. I and sure there are rolling over in there graves to see what has become of this nation meant to be under God. Look at the Dec. of Independence. You have right to freedom because of God.

By: Lee L.

Lee L. — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:42:57 +0000

The reason why they didn’t make laws regulating churches was because the founders were afraid that some corrupt government officials would try to infiltrate the churches and try to use them as propaganda mouthpieces. That happens today in modern churches through grassroots political organizations, but the government itself doesn’t have a say in what goes on in the pews. Yes, it makes for idiots who don’t believe in evolution, but that’s why we have the school system to deprogram or refute anti-evolutionism from our students. The schools would do a kickass job except that the teachers themselves are illiterate and have no idea how evolution works.

The reason why people in this country don’t accept evolution as a science is because science, like other subjects itself is taught poorly in this country. “Science teachers” are usually illiterate and are easily jetted through the college ranks. If we had real science teachers, they’d easily shred through any strawman that any churchie can bring up.

By: Felix

Felix — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:34:38 +0000

I agree Gilbert. Excellent post.

By: Gilbert

Gilbert — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:57:10 +0000

The main culprit is the 1st Amendment, which is intrinsically flawed. It states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…” The founding fathers of the US were clueless when they ratified the Bill of Rights in 1791 about the terrible monster that was religion. They didn’t make provisions to regulate it! Freedom of Religion ought to mean freedom to exercise one’s religion and not freedom of religion as an organization, in which case, you are allowing a state within a state.

So now, you have sectarian schools in the US teaching “intelligent design” as science. Religious diversity is the bane of the US. It will unseat her as a superpower.