Comments on: Blood Transfusion Didn’t Violate Rights: Top Court

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:21:29 +0000

$450,000!?!? She shouldn’t get anything! She’s wasting the courts time. She’s still alive because of that damn transfusion, she should be grateful she’s still alive and just forget about the lawsuits. The doctor’s should of just let her die, it’d save money for the hospital, and it wouldn’t waste valuable time in the supreme court.

By: Brittany

Brittany — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:58:15 +0000

Jim Scott, it says to abstain from blood somewhere in there. I think they took it out of context though when they translated it as no blood transfusions.

By: jim scott

jim scott — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:07:37 +0000

where in the bible does it say to not have a blood transfusion when needed medicaly?